SAP Automation Testing: Worksoft vs Tosca
The field of SAP Automation Testing demands reliability, efficiency, and minimal disruption to business processes. In this deep-dive blog, we’ll compare SAP Automation Testing: Worksoft vs Tosca, exploring their strengths, weaknesses, usability, and fit for enterprise needs. The keyphrase appears frequently—SAP Automation Testing: Worksoft vs Tosca—especially throughout this text.
Introduction
In the ever-evolving world of enterprise systems, SAP Automation Testing: Worksoft vs Tosca is a critical choice for organizations seeking scriptless, risk‑aware testing tools. Both platforms are widely adopted across SAP landscapes, and choosing the right one can make or break your continuous testing strategy.
SAP Automation Testing: Worksoft vs Tosca – Overview
Worksoft Certify for SAP Automation Testing
Worksoft Certify, from Worksoft Inc., is tailored for SAP Automation Testing by offering a code‑free solution that automates end‑to‑end business processes across SAP and non‑SAP applications. Clients praise its strong integration with SAP and ease of onboarding business users with minimal coding skills.
Tosca for SAP Automation Testing
Tricentis Tosca, developed by Tricentis, is a model‑based and risk‑based testing platform designed for enterprise SAP environments. Tosca automatically adapts test cases when application objects change, significantly reducing maintenance
Key Features in SAP Automation Testing: Worksoft vs Tosca
Code‑less, Model‑based Testing
Worksoft Certify uses a code‑free, process‑capture driven approach ideal for end‑users.
Tosca adopts a model‑based architecture—automating test case maintenance and enabling fast updates across SAP changes.
SAP Ecosystem Integration
Worksoft integrates natively with SAP ECC, S/4HANA, SAP Fiori, SuccessFactors, Ariba, and CRM modules.
Tosca enjoys official SAP partnership and support, embedding LiveCompare and NeoLoad for change impact analysis and performance testing.
Risk‑Based Regression & Impact Analysis
Tosca, combined with LiveCompare, enables intelligent risk‑based regression—testing only what matters after SAP changes.
Worksoft has strong coverage capabilities but lacks inherent risk‑assessment analytics; mostly relies on manual process discovery and capture.
Ease of Use and Onboarding
Worksoft is often cited as easy for non‑technical users and business analysts to adopt quickly.
Tosca is also scriptless but can involve a steeper learning curve for optimal use; many report challenges scaling beyond simple use .
Scalability and Enterprise Adoption
Worksoft supports large-scale end‑to‑end SAP testing and scheduling “lights‑off” regression overnight.
Tosca excels in large test suites, modular reuse, and multi‑user collaboration, making it suitable for teams managing thousands of test cases.
📊 Comparison Table: Worksoft vs Tosca
| Feature / Dimension | Worksoft Certify | Tricentis Tosca |
|---|---|---|
| Approach | Process-capture, code-free | Model-based, risk-based |
| SAP Integration | S/4HANA, Fiori, Ariba, Concur, SuccessFactors | SAP-certified + LiveCompare, works across technologies |
| Regression Efficiency | Regression cycles reduced from days to under 1 hour | Regression reduced from 5 days to ~30 minutes |
| Time-Based ROI | Up to 95% time savings in test cycles | Up to 90–95% test time savings, including impact-aware testing |
| Learning Curve | Easy for non-technical QA users | More complex; requires technical experience |
| Maintenance | Manual updates needed for UI or business flow changes | Auto-adapts to UI/object changes |
| Pricing (USD) *** | Approx. $6,000–$8,000 per user license annually* | Approx. $10,000–$20,000 per user license annually* |
| Customer Support | Solid support; may have slower initial response times | Responsive and knowledgeable, though scaling issues reported |
| User Base | Strong in SAP-heavy enterprises (manufacturing, pharma, retail), since 1998 | Global reach across various industries, large enterprise adoption, since 2007 |
| Community Support | Small community on Reddit, Stack Overflow | Larger community; mixed user reviews, active discussions on Reddit |
| GenAI Integration | Limited or roadmap-only | Emerging AI-driven features (test design, change impact, optimization) |
***Based on user reviews, analyst reports, and peer insights from sites like PeerSpot and Reddit. Actual enterprise pricing may vary by contract, user volume, and region.
Conclusion
Worksoft Certify
✅ Ideal for visual, business-friendly, end-to-end SAP automation
✅ Fast setup, accessible to non-technical users
❌ Less advanced analytics, manual updates for custom flows
Tricentis Tosca
✅ Model‑based, risk‑driven, highly maintainable automation
✅ Supports API, GUI, test data design; certified SAP change impact
❌ Steeper learning curve, more demanding setup, vendor-locked
🟢 Key Takeaways
Choose Worksoft for speed, simplicity, and business‑user adoption.
Opt for Tosca for scalable, risk‑aware, model‑based automation in dynamic SAP environments.
Worksoft excels at process discovery; Tosca leads in minimizing maintenance and optimizing regression.
ROI: Both tools save significant time; Tosca offers quantified ROI up to 334% over three years and payback in under six months.
Licensing, support and team skill sets should guide your final decision.
References 📚
Worksoft automation ROI and speed gains in SAP S/4HANA context
Tricentis Tosca SAP case study: ROI, reusability, speed, risk‑based testing outcomes Tricentis
Worksoft Impact for SAP change-risk analysis capabilities
SAP community reports on API‑based testing vs UI speed and scalability community.sap.com
Reddit user insights on Tosca and Worksoft usability and limitations Reddit